More Adoption News and Articles
"Fast
Track Adoption" Ends in Suicide
Natural mother commits suicide after "Fast Track Adoption"
book reveals how she was used by the woman who adopted her daughter.
(PRWEB) April 13, 2004 -- Susan Burns, Psy.D. is undoubtedly proud
of her book "Fast Track Adoption" which provides prospective
adopters some ideas on how to go about soothing a frightened young
woman's fears and making her feel she is making a good decision for
her child.
But, there is one angle her book does not cover: How will your adopted
child's natural mother feel when she finds out how proud you are of
the methods you used to talk her out of her child? How will she feel
when you break all the promises you made to her?
Burns writes: "Without an agency's interference, (the child's
parents) and (the people considering adoption) have a greater voice
in in making key decisions, often resulting in a better "fit"
for everyone involved."
"...knowing about the (prospective) adopting family prior to
the placement can assist a (natural) mother in her grieving process
by reassuring her that she has made the right choice."
It seems unlikely to me that Burns is truly concerned about everyone
involved or about the grieving process of a mother who has lost her
child to adoption.
I got this email today (April 9, 2004) from a friend who is very
involved with the open adoption community:
"I'm grieving my good friend right now. Cindy was a member of
my adoption group for a year and a half -- we were supposed to meet
next month. The (people who adopted) her daughter broke promises and
Cindy never recovered. She took her life yesterday. Her daughter will
be three on the 19th."
"I'm trying to help the members of my group ...and myself grieve.
We were all SO close. She also left behind two teen boys. Please keep
them in your prayers."
"(The woman who adopted her daughter) wrote the sickening new
adoption book "Fast Track Adoption" ...and may even appear
on 20/20 talking about how to get a baby quick. Cindy found out about
this book by accident and was devastated by it's contents and how
she was left out and used."
Many people are unaware of this dark side of adoption. The adoption
industry has found ways to thwart attempts by natural moms and adoptees
to voice their concerns about unethical adoption practices. One of
the most revolting of the tactics used to obtain babies is the promise
of "open adoption", the promise of continued contact with
their child, made only with the intent to lure in unsuspecting mothers
who might have otherwise kept their child. Open adoption agreements
are not legally binding as other child custody or visitation agreements
are and this frequently has devastating consequences. Many a mother
is grieving the loss of a child to adoption. This grieving is compounded
when she has so obviously, blatantly been used as a baby-making machine
and then tossed out like yesterday's garbage once her child is in
possession of the adopters. In Cindy's case, not only she but her
sons and probably other family members were expecting contact with
their sister, granddaughter, niece as well.
This is for Cindy Jordan and for all other moms who have been so
used. This is for Cindy's daughter, her sons, her mother and father,
her whole family. I hope our churches will mention this from the pulpit
and work to enact change. I hope our human rights organizations will
take note and work to enact changes. I hope women's organizations
will for once stand up for these women who have been so long marginalized
in this way and work to prevent further abuse.
Not everyone benefits from adoption and it's time people knew about
it and did something.
Those mothers and fathers who are making a decision whether to keep
their child or surrender their child for adoption deserve legal protections
which include real information about the emotional risks to themselves,
their child and other family members. They deserve to be protected
from slick advertising and sales pitches from those seeking to adopt
independently, from the adoption industry and from adoption lawyers.
They deserve to be protected from the pressure put on them to choose
prospective adopters before their child is even born which makes it
very hard for them to disappoint them later.
They deserve to be treated with the respect due a human being, with
the respect due a parent who is trying to make the best decision possible
for their child and their families.
Next: Why Solicitation
to Obtain Babies for Adoption Must Be Outlawed
Adoption Reform Ideas - To Protect Both Prospective Adopters and
Natural Family
1) Outlaw all solicitation for babies. (We don't solicit living
people for their kidneys and we shouldn't solicit living people for
their sons and daughters, either.)
2) Give families time after a child is born to discuss things. (In
S. Australia I think no relinquishment is valid prior to two weeks
following birth.) Give fathers time to establish paternity.
3) Provide mother, father and other family members information regarding
the risks of pshychological and other effects of separation/adoption.
4) Both mother and father (if one is recognized by the court) must
sign.
5) Have an unpressured revocation period with no prospective adopter
selected until AFTER the revocation period is over for both parents.
(In S. Australia I think this is 25 days.)
6) Do not change information on the birth certificate or seal it.
Every human being has a right to know who they really are.
(Pregnant and new Moms should already be covered by the state for
any absolutely necessary expenses, so there is no need for "down-payments"
on babies.)
This would protect prospective adopters and it would protect the
child's right to her natural family.
|